view the rest of the comments
Ask Science
Ask a science question, get a science answer.
Community Rules
Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.
Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.
Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.
Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.
Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.
Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.
Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.
Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.
Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.
Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.
Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.
Rule 7: Report violations.
Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.
Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.
Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.
Rule 9: Source required for answers.
Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.
By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.
We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.
i thought it was because the expansion doesnt actually make things move... all the space between all the things is getting bigger at the same time, making it look like things are moving... in aggregate that can look like more than speed of light
But things are actually moving.
The movement causes light emitted from those things to redshift, like the siren of an ambulance changing its pitch when it's moving away from you. And stars we can currently still see will disappear in the future, never to be seen again, as they move outside of our observable universe, accelerating faster away from us than the light they emit.
i thought distance caused red-shift.. prolly semantics.. but ... do 2 stationary objects on an expanding plane 'move'?
That's the thing. Nothing is actually moving, it just appears to be. Space itself is increasing in volume.
The best analogy isn't that everything's moving, it's that everything's shrinking.
If you and a friend are stood 2 metres apart and you suddenly both shrink, proportionately, to half your height, the distance between you is going to appear to have doubled, when in fact it's still 2 metres.
Universe expansion turns this on its head by the distance itself growing to 4 metres without either of you moving.
As to why this doesn't happen on local scales: gravity has a tendency to hold nearby things together. And closer still, atomic forces.