63
17 years* (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Bleys@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

The only alternative to proof of work is proof of stake. And if the world ever ran on proof of stake crypto, it would make today’s wealth inequality look like a Marxist paradise.

[-] mattyroses@lemmy.today 1 points 1 week ago

There's other alternatives. But PoS does not reward just by ownership either.

Check out Gnosis, especially Circles, which is creating a UBI type thing.

[-] Bleys@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I just looked at Circles’ webpage, and respectfully, that is a Ponzi scheme.

Why? If the rewards are fixed and independent of the amount staked then there is no issue.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

What matters is whether or not there's any significant profit - the reward being bigger than the cost. PoW minimizes this with difficulty adjustment flushing most profits down the toilet. PoS must always have a return competitive with other investments.

Profits should be low, or else it promotes inequality.

[-] neatchee@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago

You are exactly the type of person I'm talking about :\

Crypto is not the only use case for blockchain. 

Blockchain can be useful in inherently trusted, closed ecosystems.

Depending on the use case, proof doesn't even need to be anything more than a valid certificate (not work, not stake)

Consider a bank that develops its own blockchain ledger for internal use only, replacing their branch ledgers (which require daily reconciliation and propagation).

An immutable, distributed ledger has plenty of valid, valuable use cases without looking like crypto.

[-] Bleys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

“Internal use only” blockchain is an oxymoron. If all contributors are trusted entities, then what does it matter if the data is stored in a blockchain vs any other data structure? If anything the amount of extra work to maintain and modify the blockchain in the case of errors just makes it unnecessary.

If that’s the best example of its many “valid, valuable use cases”, then it’s still a pass from me, dawg.

[-] neatchee@piefed.social -1 points 1 week ago

I have a large number of examples in this comment from four months ago. Please read them: https://lemmy.world/post/36683795/19677963

[-] Bleys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Literally the first example you gave was shut down a year later: https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoReality/comments/1mpeh9z/when_crypto_bros_are_asked_for_a_blockchain_use/

Pretty obvious that its use in the first place was some FOMO executives trying to get in on “blockchain” technology, just like they’re doing with AI and LLMs now. Funny how BTC and ETH both plateaued a year ago, right around the time AI became the new thing.

I’m not going to bother reading the rest, I already wasted too much time arguing with a true believer. GL with the crypto that you say you don’t have.

this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
63 points (94.4% liked)

Microblog Memes

10844 readers
539 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS