61
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
61 points (89.6% liked)
Climate
8295 readers
452 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah, that's great 'news.'
Just two months ago, in December 2025, the same news has been published by the same outlet and written by the same author (see here).
Reuters new agency reported about that already in November 2024.
And this is by far not everything. The web is full with it. This same story has been appearing in the various outlets for several years now, mostly citing a 'new' study or 'Chinese state media' reports so that there is a reason to present it as 'new.'
And it's not the first time that OP is repeatedly posting the same 'news' over and again, just with a different framing, and obviously only to make China look good and to promote its propaganda.
The other side of this is that they’ve been doing this since the late 70s and have a wealth of information about what works and what doesn’t work.
Something like a quarter of China is desert, so they have vested interest in actually making this work.
I agree you get a lot of propo, but what do you think the point of that is here?
To provide and example: You will easily find stories about Ford CEO Jim Farley saying that Chinese EVs are ahead of those by Western manufacturers - this story has been appearing in various (and also Western) outlets for some time now. The framing is always a bit different, but the story is always the same.
Here we have the same pattern - one story, published with a slightly different framing (and often with a misleading title, as it is the case also here, because the survival rate of these trees might be too low in the long run as several of these article also say - see here -, but it's a bold headline).
Another recent propaganda push is probably the (false) narrative that China has banned all investments in Israel over Gaza. I read headlines here on Lemmy and on many outlets, including Western media. But it is complete fantasy. It's a completely fabricated story as China-Israel ties are stronger than ever, with both investment and trade at record levels.
Don't get me wrong, I don't say planting trees is a bad thing. It's good. But such headlines and the endless stream of always the same news don't aim at informing on climate policy, but rather to distort reality and serve authoritarian propaganda while creating narratives that are outright false. The only goal here is to promote "the West bad, only China good" stance, which is, of course, complete rubbish.
The “with a different framing” bit is what I was missing.
That makes perfect sense.
While I hear ya, it seems to be a proper article from a proper outlet written by someone reputable, albeit based on a study by a bunch of chinese researchers- not that there is anything inherently suspicious about that.
I also got the "feel-good China slop" reaction at first but I don't know, seems legit.
They’re stories that are generally on the same topic, their focuses are different.
Also, thought you seemed familiar. Last time I commented was in response to basically the same stuff.