16
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

The administration ended a program that documented excessive levels of a carcinogen at industrial facilities across the country. Environmental groups who say the move leaves polluted communities behind have filed suit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The goal is to reduce the quality of life of the average US citizen to match the low quality of life in poor countries so our labor can "compete" in the market by vastly reducing our pay and purchasing power.

It's part of why Trump is pushing the "return to manufacturing" angle so hard. He doesn't want people in other countries being paid pennies a day to put together $300 Nike shoes, he wants people in the US being paid pennies a day to put together $300 Nike shoes.

I mean, it's a long time coming. The wealthy have clearly thought for a long time that US workers are too coddled and demand too much and deserve far far less.

[-] how_we_burned@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

The goal is to reduce the quality of life of the average US citizen to match the low quality of life in poor countries so our labor can "compete" in the market by vastly reducing our pay and purchasing power.

I swear the republicans watched Hunger Games 1 and thought fuck yeah let's build a fascist dystopia.

My bingo card has for 2027 > Trump introduces a hunger games like gladiatorial death match tournament.

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah he doesn't get that the US is the consumer of those $300 sneakers and if he destroys our economy there wont be enough people to buy those sneakers and their value based on supply will crater without the demand.

Billionaires will only buy the sneakers once.

[-] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Intelligence is not one of his assets. And TBH, as long as him and his cronies make $$$, then don't care who they take down.

[-] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Who do they expect to buy their $300 shoes, then?

[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I can't believe I have to say this, but... USA isn't the only country with a viable middle class to sell shit to anymore. There's Canada, most of Europe, Australia, Japan, South Korea, China... Other countries may not have as large of middle class citizens to pull from, but they exist as well in places like Brazil, India, Egypt, Israel, Iran, South Africa, and the United Arab Emirates as well as others.

Sometimes I am dumbfounded by my fellow US citizens still somehow thinking we're the center of the fucking world when all that good will from the rest of the world was flushed down the shitter after 9/11. Trump is just the final stages of no one giving a flying fuck what happens to our middle class anymore.

300 million people in the USA are the bottom 90%, that's a fucking drop in the bucket of the worldwide population. Do you really think that they're gonna be hurting by not selling to just us anymore? Just, christ, USA's economy doesn't exist in a vacuum.

[-] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

What about the part where Trump burned all goodwill with the rest of the world through his trade war and actual wars? He tanked the US's export market at the same time that he's tanking the domestic market. There are other wealthy consumers, but they'd rather be buying from literally anyone else besides the US.

[-] LucidNightmare@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Unfortunately, they don't think that far because them and theirs will be able to buy those shoes.

[-] Bustedknuckles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Right now something like 10% of Americans are doing around 50% of consumer spending. Back to feudalism for us!

this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2026
16 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29216 readers
495 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS