857
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 2 months ago

That would make it less accurate. It's much more likely to return true on not a prime than a prime

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Code proof or it didn't happen.

Extra credit for doing it in Ruby

[-] themusicman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Correct. Not are why people are upvoting. If 10% of numbers are prime in a range, and you always guess false, you get 90% right. If you randomly guess true 10% of the time, you get ~80% right.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago

More random means more towards 50% correctness.

[-] ptu@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 months ago

And 2,3,5,7 are primes of the first numbers, making always false 60% correct and random chance 50%

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
857 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

31092 readers
902 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS