134
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz to c/solarpunk@slrpnk.net

Just a few years ago, electric buses routinely faltered in cold conditions, reinforcing doubts about whether they could replace diesel and natural gas-burning fleets in northern cities. Now, with better batteries and strategically placed chargers, Madison is at the forefront of a small but growing number of cities testing whether those doubts still hold. Making the technology work through a long Midwestern winter could reshape how others approach electrification. Some 3.6 million commuters nationwide rely on buses to get around. With transportation accounting for roughly 28 percent of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, transit agencies are looking for alternatives to polluting machinery that creates a particular health risk around bus stops.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] No_Maines_Land@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 months ago

With transportation accounting for roughly 28 percent of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, transit agencies...

28% of emissions are in the transportation sector, but busses are part of the 2% of the transportation sector that doesn't get it's own category. Or <0.5% overall.

emissions in 2022 were light-duty trucks, which include sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks, and minivans (37%); medium- and heavy-duty trucks (23%); passenger cars (20%); commercial aircraft (7%); other aircraft (2%); pipelines (4%); ships and boats (3%); and rail (2%).

https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/transportation-sector-emissions

I'm not saying electrifying busses isn't good. It definitely is. Especially for local air quality. But as a priority, it's pretty low down.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not sure I agree with this. Many of those vehicles don't even need to exist, so effort is better spent on eliminating them. Buses are among the few vehicles that actually provide public benefits greater than their costs, so it makes sense to invest in new technology to improve them.

And as you alluded to, the air pollution benefits can be substantial.

[-] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

Which of those vehicles don't even need to exist?

[-] nodiratime@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"Light duty" trucks (or rather, 95% or so of them).

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

most unnecessarily huge passenger vehicles

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Most of the passenger vehicles. A good chunk of heavy trucking could be replaced with rail too.

I didn't mean any category would be totally eliminated, just the numbers reduced substantially for some.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2026
134 points (99.3% liked)

Solarpunk

8833 readers
55 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS