337
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Crisps@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Dynamically typed languages don’t scale. Large project bases become hard to maintain, read and refactor.

Basic type errors which should be found in compilation become runtime errors or unexpected behavior.

[-] TechieDamien@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Not really a hot take. Why do you think most dynamic languages have the option to tack on static typing?

[-] xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on the community. In Lisp communities, for example, it's very much a hot take. Which is a shame, because I'd love a statically typed Lisp-like language.

[-] MashedTech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We can feel it in our bones... And boy is it a pain when you find a huge codebase that is JS only or python without types. Fucking hell dealing with that shit

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
337 points (96.2% liked)

Programming

17314 readers
374 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS