35
submitted 2 months ago by osanna@lemmy.vg to c/science@lemmy.world

Interesting read.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

There's a certain cost-benefit imbalance in these habits: sure, it's not a great cost to leave some litter around. People can just step over it. But while one person marginally benefits from it, hundreds more pay the (also tiny, admittedly) cost of the unpleasantness. When you multiply it like that, the negligible becomes gligible.

[-] porcoesphino@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So anyone that says something others don't like shouldn't speak?

The whole platform is based around upvotes and downvotes as a signal to highlight/filter (via sorting) posts and comments that, based on the viewing algorithm chosen, are more/less useful to an averaged user.

I get the litter analogy, that was blindingly obvious from the first comment. I just don't think it carries well for a platform like this, or quickly expands to "I don't personally like your comments and the way you use this platform so stop". I appreciate sometimes that's needed, but this seems pretty far from those situations. Plus the post seemed presumptuous and insulting because... someone used a tool slightly differently than them and had the audacity to reply?

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
35 points (100.0% liked)

science

26588 readers
24 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS