35
submitted 2 months ago by osanna@lemmy.vg to c/science@lemmy.world

Interesting read.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lol_idk@piefed.social 0 points 2 months ago

What kind of society was this? Was it just rape?

[-] lol_idk@piefed.social 1 points 2 months ago

Look, I just wanted to start an interesting conversation and it worked. I don't mind the downvotes because every reply and vote, up or down, means people are talking.

Humans have a pretty spotty history with how they treat each other, it's not a huge stretch to imagine some weird historical moment where consent wasn't a concept or wasn't recognized. The word rape was pretty strong for me to use, but just a few years ago we used to call it date rape instead of just rape.

[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago

There's likely no way for us to determine.

It's difficult to determine if someone consented last night, never mind tens of thousands of years before the earliest written histories. We have precious little evidence of what societies were like during that time period.

[-] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

If only based on typical human behaviour: Probably both. There's always someone that's into something a bit different, so if Sapiens and Neaderthals intermixed sufficiently, there'll always be some couple that gets it on. Hell, there's people that fuck dogs (and dogs that try to fuck people). If dogs had been capable of consenting, I'm absolutely positive that some consenting human/dog couple would exist. I would say that consenting inter-species couples would have been inevitable given enough mixing of the groups.

Then there's also the long history of sexual violence in conflicts. Sapiens and Neanderthals were competing for resources, so there's bound to have been tribal conflict at some point. Just based on how humans behave in that kind of situation, it's pretty much guaranteed that people were raped during those conflicts.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

I know some vegans who are going to be very upset with this point of view.

[-] bold_omi@lemmy.today 0 points 2 months ago

Forgive me if I am wrong, but it seems that you ae implying that vegans are zoophillic. Veganism ≠ beastiality.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

no, I'm making a reference to a shitpost that was made earlier this week where it brought attention to bestiality laws in conjunction with animal husbandry/breeding on farms.

the original image was a repost of a repost where someone made a catty comment about vegans.

the uproar was immense and caused the post to spill over to vegan communities where they clutched their pearls at the commentary that wasn't even made by anyone on Lemmy and proceeded to raid the shitpost community.

the comments were a disaster and the entire thread was quickly overrun by veganistic puritans who just wanted a flame war.

it was honestly the most hilarious thing I ever saw on here.

post looks to be deleted now though.

[-] bold_omi@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2026
35 points (100.0% liked)

science

26588 readers
23 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS