102

As of today, about half of all U.S. states have some form of age verification law around. Nine of those were passed in 2025 alone, covering everything from adult content sites to social media platforms to app stores.

Right now, California's Digital Age Assurance Act (AB 1043) is all the rage right now, which targets not only websites and apps but also operating systems. Come January 1, 2027, every OS provider must collect a user's age at account setup and provide that data to app developers via a real-time API.

Colorado is also working on a near-identical bill, which we covered earlier.

The EFF's year-end review put it more bluntly: 2025 was "the year states chose surveillance over safety." The foundation's concern, which I concur with, is, where does this stop? Self-reported birthday today, government ID tomorrow? There appears to be no limit to these laws' overreach.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 hours ago

Billionaires are people.

They have the will to fuck everything that moves.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 hours ago

Billionaires certainly are people, but these laws don't even serve billionaires in any meaningful sense, so that's hardly an explanation without more elaboration.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 12 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Well, the billionaires that own age verification and surveillance services have gone from trying their best to stalk to world through tracking and analytics, despite pesky privacy laws, to forcing giant swaths of populations to hand over data by compulsion.

Yeah, they're making a mint off us.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 4 hours ago

OK, that's about the elaboration I was looking for...

Somehow I don't think this is the central reason. I think governments are perfectly capable of doing bad things completely without billionaires having an interest in it. It especially doesn't explain things like the California law that will regulate how we can or cannot program operating systems (hint: software code is a form of speech, meaning that this ought to be struck down as a violation of free speech), because no age verification services are involved in that.

[-] Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I am Californian and that one snuck past me. I really didn't hear anything about it until recently and I'm pretty pissed.

You can't put the genie back into the lamp on biometrics. We needed real control over outlr digital data and biometrics before this became law. I hope it is repealed somehow, but the elite class don't give a fuck.

As for business vs government, government is scrutinized closer but businesses get away with much more. It's easier to get around red tape to outsource work to businesses than build government infrastructure to do things themselves.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 hours ago

I really didn’t hear anything about it until recently

Yes, I expressed the same sentiment here: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/55959326/24302621

Is our entire information "ecosystem" so broken that we only pay attention to bad things after they've already happened, not before when there is still a chance to stop them?!

this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
102 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42433 readers
288 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS