102
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2026
102 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
42433 readers
288 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
No, they are censorship laws aimed at preventing young people from accessing certain types of information that specific groups don't want young people learning about, such as their sexuality, concepts like atheism, and safety information regarding drugs.
No. History taught me one thing only: if they say they want to protect kids, it's never about the kids. It's a slogan that helps to sell unpopular laws
Exactly, they have all this already established laws to protect kids, but everyone seem pretty chill about pedofiles
If you think blocking access to knowledge about sexuality, atheism, or drugs is actually protecting children and not about a controlling and unpopular law I don't know what to tell you. Because it's clearly not actually intended to protect children as much as it is to block inconvenient information to help indoctrinate children to be compliant and unquestioning.
They want to bind your id with the device you use and restricting queer kids from discovering that they're queer is the best thing you have in mind?