32
are community based distros stable or only corp ones?
(lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
32 points (82.0% liked)
Linux
63789 readers
1070 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
You've got that backwards. Community distros are more likely to be stable than corporate ones.
how?
People + Dream/Cause Shared + Time Available
Corporations can go out of business, have an incentive to enshittify, etc. Communities/non-profit foundations generally don't.
The only way a community project can cease to be "stable" (in the "not going away" sense you're using it) is if literally nobody competent cares enough to maintain it anymore, and if that's the case, was anything of value really lost?
Like when they force you to upgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11, but your computer isn't powerful enough to run the latter.
cant you just bypass it with rufus? i ran windows 11 on 2gen intel with ssd before it was quiet fast even.
Little known fact is that a lot of computers that ran/run Windows 10 is not supported by Windows 10 (check supported CPUs for Windows 10). The difference is that Windows 10 doesn’t actively block you from installing it.
You ran Windows 11 on a 286???
not that no it was an i7 from 2gen laptop
I think what they're trying to say is, if Windows was a community project those requirements likely wouldn't exist to begin with.
I don't run Windows at all. I'm probably not up to date on the latest developments, the last time I checked, there was a compatibility check for your hardware. Anyway, it seems strange to me that Windows would run fast on an old machine—are you sure about that?
im very sure. i used it for months before i got a new laptop
Have you ever tried installing Linux Mint on that PC? I’m not asking to encourage you to try it, but just to get your opinion. I consider Mint one of the best operating systems for breathing new life into old PCs, and I wanted to know if (assuming you’ve tried Mint) you think Windows is roughly on par with it in terms of performance.
i didnt no. but i did try to run on it arch linux before it ran fine.