20
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] u_tamtam@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

Was there even a point you wanted to make? I'm not sure exactly where you are heading with all this.

I mean, “machine learning” was a marketing term invented exactly to avoid the A in AI.

No, it's not. ML is a sub-category within the collection of AI techniques that describes those algorithms whose behaviour is the result of fitting a training data-set to a pre-defined model by minimising an agreed-upon error function. For the longest of times, we were just calling that "statistics", and many ML techniques and algorithms predate computers by centuries. Your mean-squares curve fitting? …qualifies as ML. That is to say, ML is all AI, but not all AI is ML.

LLMs are no different than function fitting with mean-squares. They are not magical, they are not black-boxes: they are fully described and completely predictable.

[-] TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

Yes, the point is LLMs are AI.

ML is AI too. But sales didn't call it that because AI had the reputation of "just brute force with some heuristics".

Now we forget about that so it's hype to call things AI again. Once LLMs lose their magic the next big AI thing will again not be sold as AI.

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2026
20 points (83.3% liked)

Technology

42541 readers
494 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS