74
submitted 1 month ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/world@lemmy.world

"This war has nothing to do with NATO. It's not NATO’s war," Stefan Kornelius, a spokesperson for German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, told reporters in Berlin on Monday. "NATO is a defensive alliance, an alliance for the defense of its territory," he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

NATO is not for undocumented wars.

Glances at the last 80 years of NATO history

:-/

[-] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

There is a huge difference though. No terror attacks on USA, they already said they "nuked them back to zero" with the other operation. They couldn't define what the end-goal is for operation fury.

They don't even agree on why they do this internally. And now they want other states to join in on a war happened because of Trumps small dick. I say fuck no. Let him have the consequences of this retarded administration for once. Let him dig his own grave.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

No terror attacks on USA

You just have to pretend Israel is part of the United States

[-] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

They are not, and isn't a part of NATO

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

The United States is absolutely part of NATO.

And Israel functions as a forward operating base, from which European military powers can control the Suez and the Eastern Mediterranean. It's fundamental to the Western allied control of North Africa and the Middle East, even before you get into its function as a money laundering outfit and testing bed for military technology and policing strategy.

European leadership has a closer relationship with Israeli military than Turkish military, as a point of comparison.

[-] ranzispa@mander.xyz -1 points 1 month ago

Serbia never attacked the US either.

[-] Barracuda@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

Clearly the world should have let Serbia continue it's genocide. /S

People bitch when NATO stops a genocide and people bitch when NATO doesn't.

[-] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

UN exists for that purpose, NATO does not exist for that purpose.

Tbf I don't remember many occasions in which people were complaining because NATO should have entered a conflict to stop a genocide.

[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago

I bitch when people can't tell its from it's.

[-] Samskara@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Yes, Serbia should have been allowed to genocide more Muslim Bosnians and Albanians. Also Ghadaffi should have been allowed to butcher his population.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

World News

55691 readers
329 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS