72
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2026
72 points (98.6% liked)
Linux
13076 readers
201 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I use obsidian extensively, and I love it. It certainly does seem to use WAY more system resources than it should though, and I assume that electron is to blame. It's a shame they didn't base it on a different framework.
Perhaps someone who knows more about web development can explain what sort of upsides electron brings with it.
Programs run everywhere from the same codebase.
There are other options for that, though, and I'd rather have Java, with all its issues, any day.
I think it's more "people who trained only in web development can produce what they fondly think is a desktop application".
Naah its just that web development is most advanced in terms of ease of use and UI development.
Creating native apps in java or cpp was horrible.
Easier ≠ better. Granted, most amateur-written UIs aren't that great, but I find anything created specifically for the web is almost always worse. They're massively bloated, they reinvent wheels all the time (and ship them out while they're still egg-shaped with off-centre axles), and they don't adapt well to systems with non-default settings.
As for Java UI coding, well, I did enough of it, back in the day. Tedious, sometimes nitpicky, but far from the worst thing I've ever done, codewise.
Well that's certainly a big plus point.
I think it's more that Electron apps can be written in javascript, and there are way more javascript developers than any other kind. So you're naturally going to see a lot more javascript software.
So it is, quite literally, a skill issue.
As an aside for anyone else reading, Trillium Notes is a good open source alternative to Obsidian.