I have never seen that page before, but that's hilarious. I somewhat hope that he did that as a demonstration of, hey, someone may do this because it's hard for me to wrap my head around someone who uses a computer for a living, doing something like that.

Being said, I think that prompt went above and beyond what was needed. At some point you just need to let the user touch the hot stove top... It stated what it was going to do, stated that it was going to be potentially dangerous and unlikely what the user wanted, and then reiterated that it was core essential packages needed for it to run... I don't know what else they could do there. I would definitely be against adding further restrictions though. If he was willing to type that in, I don't know what would stop him from doing that, to be honest, Maybe a..." I acknowledge this would break my system..." instead of it being yes-do as I say. But I don't know.

Being said hard agree there is zero reason that a package like steam should be able to uninstall your desktop., That was definitely a bug or a misconfiguration with the steam package. That was unexcusable. I just think they gave more than enough information of what that would do and he did it anyway.

I firmly agree at some point the ends don't justify the means and Android has definitely got to that point with unsigned packages prior to making this change., And I don't think the ends justify the means to implement such a system. And I definitely think there is ulterior motives for implementing it.