85
Optical illusion (i.redd.it)
submitted 1 week ago by Beep@lemmus.org to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] brown567@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It should be noted that this chart compares gun homicides to gun ownership, which... of course those will correlate

If we plotted kangaroo injuries vs kangaroos per capita, we'd see a similar outlier in Australia

It would be more useful to see gun ownership compared to total homicides, to see if an overabundance of guns correlates with more murders. Even then, though, a correlation between the two might not be casual in that direction. It may instead be that in areas with a high homicide rate, people are more likely to own a firearm for defense.

What you would need to prove is that places with high gun ownership have significantly higher homicide rates, but places with high homicide rates don't have significantly higher rates of gun ownership

[-] Maroon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

That's exactly the point! The whole, "it's the owner, not the gun" argument is dumb. If you have more guns, you have more gun-related homicides -- as simple as that.

When the populace don't have easy access to guns, then that's one weapon less they can use to hurt others.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Don't think everyone needs or should own a gun. But of course if you compare gun ownership to gun related deaths it's generally going to be higher when more guns per capita are present. You can do the same thing with cars, lawn mowers, dogs and even vending machines. The more of a thing there is, of course there is going to be more deaths and injuries related to it.

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2026
85 points (94.7% liked)

Comic Strips

23133 readers
354 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS