76
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2026
76 points (97.5% liked)
Movies & TV
23728 readers
244 users here now
Rules for Movies & TV Discussion
-
Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
-
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
-
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.
Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS

This also reflects a deeper problem with how magic works in Harry Potter: by reducing it to rules you can learn, spells you can recite, and potions anyone can make if they just follow the instructions well enough, it ceases to be magical. It's just another technology, albeit one you need a certain gene to able to fully use.
To be appropriately magical, magic should have large elements of the unknown (maybe even the unknowable!), and use should come with risks and uncertainties. You're peeking behind the veil, you're tapping powers you don't fully understand. Make it too legible and it not only loses its luster, but invites the audience to endlessly ask "why didn't they just _______?"
you can systematically study any repeatable phenomena, and such studying is one of the few things i'm willing to claim is human nature. A story where magic only works sometimes, not under the control of the users, would just be god from the machine over and over and we'd find it rather boring.
But we don't fully understand the natural world either. Magic should have multiple competing schools of thought just like how science has multiple competing schools of thought. Like, there should be 4-elementists engaged in a bitter struggle with 5-elementists with a 5-elementism schism between true 5-elementism and 4+1-elementism.
If magic is totally random or up to the whims of some obscure power, I'm with you. I'm envisioning something more like taming a wild animal. You can be more or less skilled at it, but there's always some level of uncertainty and danger. There are parts of the interaction you don't (and probably never will) fully understand. Results are never routine or guaranteed.