103
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Not doing much to stop it is a weird way of saying actively helping it.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -4 points 3 weeks ago

I see you too are actively helping it then. It's your own words!

[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah buddy I wasn't saying not actively working against it was helping it. I meant literally helping it. That Administration was actively arming the Israelis and aiding in the genocide. Super weird that you didn't know that.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ok then tell me this, did Bibi like Biden? Did he want Biden to win? Did he think Biden let him do all he wanted? What did Biden say about Bibi in return?

Then you can look at things like Republicans voting to force continued sales of weapons

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/16/us/politics/house-bill-reverse-israel-arms-pause.html

Meanwhile; https://thehill.com/policy/defense/5429072-sanders-resolution-fails-israel-military/

Tell me what Biden could've done that wouldn't amount to starting a war?

You're such a ghoul, actively helping people like Musk and Miller and ensuring Trump won't put up obstacles for Israel murdering people in Lebanon and Iran. Because it's more important to you that people get martyred against their will for your personal ideological purity. You knew the genocide would get worse if Trump won and you decided that would be better

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Biden Administration Bypassed Congress on Weapons Sale to Israel

To start with, he could have, uh, not bypassed congress on weapons sales to Israel.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's certainly telling what he was willing to bypass congress to do after he couldn't bypass congress for the agenda he ran on.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Its illegal to send weapons or money to a country that is committing genocide. Biden could have simply said he cannot legally support Israel in any way and then just not. Instead Biden chose to lie for Israel aboiut 40 beheaded babies and provide unlimited diplomatic support, going so far as to bomb Yemen for resisting.

Democratic leadership knew this would decrease turnout, they prioritized unlimited support for Israel over winning the election.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ok then if you're right why was Netanyahu mad at Biden? Why did he want Trump to win? Because there's no such thing as unlimited support and then wanting to remove the person you're getting unlimited support from

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Because Biden's base was less pro-genocide, so no matter what Biden himself did, strategically the republicans would always be a safer bet.

There was no level of support the dems could offer that would have caused Netanyahu to support them over the republicans.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Do you understand that a lot of politics is theater? You have to watch what people actually do, not what they pretend.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ok so then why are you refusing to look at what people actually did?

Edit: Trump has been pushing for ethnic cleansing so he could have waterfront casinos and you guys love him

You're all a bunch of traitors

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I think because your definition of "what people actually did" and mine differs a lot. Either that or we are talking past each other.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, your crowd decided to help Republicans guarantee more people got killed and tortured.

But you're pretending you have no responsibility for the consequences of your actions because you're such an ideologically pure idealist

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world -5 points 3 weeks ago

This is a russian/eastern perspective. Theater has no effect on real life politics does. They are NOT the same. If you act like they are you are part of the problem.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

This is a russian/eastern perspective.

No its not. This is the plain western world reality that politicians lie and posture. If you think you can trust what they say then I dont know what to tell you.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

Yes they lie but that is not theater. That is a lie. Do you not know the difference? This kind of mindset is exactly what im talking about.

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

In Biden/Harris's case of supporting the zionists while pretending to be against what they are doing-- with nonsense like his idiotic and pointless floating dock, and his very temporary freeze on one type of munition-- "lies vs theater" seems to me to be a distinction without a difference.

And do you remember all the times we heard that Biden and Harris were negotiating feverishly with netenyahu and talking about their concerns, for the Israelis to then say Biden never called them and there has been no communication at all? So how do you see that distinction between lies and theater matters at all?

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Fuck israel. Theres and entire school of iranian kids that are now dead because harris lost. That is the destinction.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is a russian/eastern perspective

Pro-genocide centrists (there is no other kind) say this about everyone who disagrees with them on their only policy.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You can not be anti genocide and actively assist Republicans in making the genocide worse.

If you genuinely oppose genocide you're obligated to oppose those who want to make it worse, and yet you're helping them

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

If you don't like genocide, it means you support genocide - the genocide wing of the democratic party.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No i say this to anyone trying to downplay the severity of political involvement. The fact you dont understand this is exactly why

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

The fact you dont understand this is exactly why

I love how centrists imagine that people don't understand them when they're just not buying their flimsy justification for genocide support.

If centrists wanted anything more than they wanted genocide, they would actually have fought for something harder than they did for genocide. I don't think any of you ever will.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 weeks ago

I'm pretty sure you'll call the students who protested centrists for not being successful enough too

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Who gives a fuck! You ghouls care more about your fucking parasocial kayfabe character drama than the lives of millions of people

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You call it kayfabe and call me a ghoul and then you're choosing to help Republicans hurt billions

That makes you a monster

Edit: you saw what project 2025 would do and decided to help people like Musk, Miller, Bannon and Trump, so that they could escalate the suffering, because YOU WANTED IT, because you prefer seeing people die if it means USA loses status, you'll rather see people martyred then fed by aid from a source you find offensive

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Lol. At least try to be consistent

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 weeks ago

I am consistent in calling you out for selectively doing whatever helps Republicans

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago

Its illegal to send weapons or money to a country that is committing genocide.

Cool. What’s the source, please?

Also, does it work when we’re the one doing it? And is it strictly genocide or is it general war criming.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Here's a list of domestic laws that were violated, to say nothing of international law:

The Foreign Assistance Act, which forbids the provision of assistance to a government which “engages in a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights.”

Arms Export Control Act, which says countries that receive U.S. military aid can only use weapons for legitimate self-defense and internal security. Israel’s genocidal campaign in Gaza goes way beyond self-defense and internal security.

The U.S. War Crimes Act, which forbids grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions, including wilful killing, torture or inhuman treatment, wilfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health, and unlawful deportation or transfer, perpetrated by the Israeli Occupying Forces.

The Leahy Law, which prohibits the U.S. Government from using funds for assistance to units of foreign security forces where there is credible information implicating that unit in the commission of gross violations of human rights.

The Genocide Convention Implementation Act, which was enacted to implement U.S. obligations under the Genocide Convention, provides for criminal penalties for individuals who commit or incite others to commit genocide

https://www.commondreams.org/opinion/us-weapons-to-israel

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Pretty trivially easy question. Biden could have done a lot of things -- vetoed funding and stopped running interference for Israel in the UN. And he could have called it a genocide and illegal on the world stage. Biden refused to call it a genocide. He could have called for an international force to stop the killing. He also flew recon missions for the Israelis with US drones over Gaza didnt he.

And "starting a war"? with who, Israel? Are you stupid? That war would last 5 minutes. Biden took massive amounts of money from AIPAC his entire career, and called himself a zionist all the time. Your pretending he had no choice and was simply a victim of circumstance is pure lies. He was massively bribed. A corrupt peice of shit genocide supporter. He would absolutely lose his case and be imprisoned if the US had done the right thing and signed onto the ICC. He belongs in an orange jumpsuit, sharing a cell with trump.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you're 100% right why did Netanyahu want to get rid of him?

Why has NOT A SINGLE ONE OF YOU responded to this question with anything but insults?

[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Dont look at words, look at actions.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world -4 points 3 weeks ago

A war with iran. Because trump won we have now killed dozens/hundreds of iranians. People that would not have died if harris had won. So again what would biden/harris have done that would have amounted to starting a war. Are you stupid...

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

You are happy to accept this as long as no one had a non-genocidal candidate to vote for.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago

No im not. Those iranians wouldnt have died if trump was not in office. Everyone who didnt do all they could to stop his assention is responsible for their deaths. They would not have died if kamela had won. The palestiniams would have died either way so they do not change the equation at all.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The palestiniams would have died either way

Good for you. You got all you ever wanted.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The gall to ignore the deaths of Iranian civilians while saying this

Just admit you prefer to let more innocent people get hurt as long at you can claim your hands are clean. If you can't uphold your purity you would rather let people die

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

The gall to ignore the deaths of Iranian civilians while saying this

It must really bother you that you have to pretend that you don't love it.

[-] thlibos@thelemmy.club -1 points 2 weeks ago

Something else to think about? If you voted third party or sat out, your hands aren't necessarily clean ofgenocide. Do you pay federal income tax?

I would argue that contributing thousands of unaccountable $ to the federal government which you know is going to engage in violence and empire building makes one much more morally culpable for US actions than a single vote for president in a single election.

Can those who think the moral action was to not vote at all or not vote D or R because that is support for genocide, but who pay federal income tax, care to explain how their hands are clean?

To bring it back to the trolley problem, it's like refusing to pull the lever because to do so would be to acknowledge that the entire exercise is ethical or otherwise valid, while forgetting to mention that you personally financed that specific trolley and stretch of track.

I suspect there a certain kind of person that is only interested in taking moral or ethical stands if the personal consequences for doing so are zero. How long do we think it would take for either major party to start begging the electorate to tell them how to behave if a significant majority of the populace decided today to stop going to work and to stop paying any taxes?

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No i didnt. I boted for harris to try and stop this bullshit. YOU got what you wanted. Hattis losy amd now the world must contend with the consequences. Now people will die because harris lost. And that is what you wamted isnt it.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

No i didnt.

You got genocide and no centrist has ever wanted anything else.

I voted for harris to try and stop this bullshit.

I voted for harris. I will never forgive myself for voting for genocide just because it was the less horrible option. You voted for genocide first, candidate second.

Harris lost and now the world must contend with the consequences and even more people will die.

You got the only thing you ever wanted. Stop griping that your close second choice is doing it instead of your first choice.

[-] Natanael@slrpnk.net -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Stop pretending other people are responsible for YOUR choices, you monster

You're just not believable. Everything you say appear crafted to convince people to stop opposing Republicans' acceleration of genocide. You're trying to convince people to stop taking action to oppose evil, to settle for just complaining about it.

You want people to stop taking action and stop making better choices because no choice is pure enough. But instead that makes you responsible when the worst outcomes happen

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You’re trying to convince people to stop taking action to oppose evil, to settle for just complaining about it.

I'm trying to get people to kick the worthless genocidal shit you worship to the curb where they belong. I advocate for the honest primaries you don't want because dishonest primaries are the only thing keeping your genocidal shit in office where you want anyone who wants to murder Palestinian children for your entertainment.

[-] Zexks@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You havent advocated for anything but voter apathy and disengagent. Your arguments herr are exactly why this is all happening.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You havent advocated for anything but voter apathy and disengagent.

I get that you think that since you can't imagine a politician moving away from your only policy.

[-] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Ok then tell me this, did Bibi like Biden?

Who gives a fuck! You ghouls care more about your fucking parasocial kayfabe character drama than the lives of millions of people

this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
103 points (89.9% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9795 readers
18 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS