38
nvim-treesitter Was Archived. Here's What You Actually Need to Do. (samuellawrentz.com)
submitted 3 days ago by codeinabox@programming.dev to c/neovim@programming.dev
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

What happened?

edit: never mind, i should learn to read the fucking article hah

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 days ago

Had the same question, until I've read your comment

For everyone else with the same thought:

Quick context: Neovim 0.12 (released March 29) ships built-in treesitter support, a native plugin manager, and native LSP completion. The nvim-treesitter maintainer had been rewriting the plugin to require 0.12 - and documented this clearly. Users kept demanding backward compat with 0.11. Maintainer burned out and archived it. The Hacker News thread sided overwhelmingly with the maintainer. Hard to disagree.

[-] soc@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago

The Hacker News thread sided overwhelmingly with the maintainer. Hard to disagree.

Not sure I'd buy that line of thought.

this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2026
38 points (97.5% liked)

Neovim

2802 readers
16 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
erlingur@programming.dev
howarddo@programming.dev
lung@lemmy.world