32
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
32 points (100.0% liked)
technology
24341 readers
330 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Ironically "IPv8" has WAY less addresses than IPv6. It really sucks that IPv6 adoption has been such a disaster. I would've loved if there was some magic solution that expanded the address space while keeping the same infrastructure but I guess we'll be dealing with NATs for a long while still
The fact that ipv6 was basically in the process of being rolled out until some IT guy in Chicago or whatever came up with NAT hardware is one of those moments changed history forever. That guy with his little box managed to lock us into ipv4 at just the right time that it's going to be basically impossible to switch now.