39
Australian federal court warns lawyers over ‘unacceptable’ use of AI
(www.theguardian.com)
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
If you're posting anything related to:
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
https://aussie.zone/communities
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
It’s funny. You ask anyone who uses GenBS in their daily workflow and they all say “it’s really good for these ancillary tasks but not for my core role”. Then you ask someone else who’s core role is those ancillary tasks and who’s ancillary tasks are person A’s core role and they will say the same thing.
Maybe they assume it has any use whatsoever because they only understand their core role and don’t understand their ancillary tasks
The exception are Lawyers and Advertisers. I think that this is because the average Lawyers core role is to generate BS and the majority of Advertising is completely pointless.
There are good lawyers and advertising workers out there; they are the ones who don’t use GenBS.
AI looks like it's good for X...if aren't familiar with or regularly do X.
Same old fuckin' story of work devaluing. "Hurr i can do your job"