-16
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

The Grayzone is not reliable reporting. It is no different from the Daily Mail or Breitbart, it simply leans in a different direction.

Reader beware.

[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 1 year ago
[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Debate requires both parties to engage in good faith. I am not engaging in debate, this is a rejection of con artists.

[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Correct. You are refusing to engage in good faith, dismissing discussion due to your anticommunist fervor.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

No, I simply require that any source I engage with be better than strongly biased. Debating a fervent anyone is pointless. A fervent communist is no different from a fervent anyone else, and their passion can blind them. Once you do this enough times, you eventually find there is no point.

The simple fact that you immediately jumped to ad hominem without even recognizing that I am not debating the source, not arguing against it, merely stating it should be rejected wholesale, is indicative of this. This is my central thesis, if you would like to debate me on something.

load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
-16 points (26.5% liked)

World News

32289 readers
881 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS