74
Federal policy on biofuels goes from bad to worse under Trump (www.canarymedia.com)
submitted 1 week ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

By diverting food crops into fuel and inflating demand for grain and vegetable oil, Trump’s jacked-up mandates will increase food prices, food shortages, and food insecurity. They’ll also accelerate deforestation and greenhouse gas emissions, inducing the world’s farmers to clear tens of millions of acres of new fields to exploit the higher prices for their crops. At the same time, they’ll inflate demand for fertilizer that’s already in short supply because of the Iran war, further increasing global food prices as well as corn-country pollution.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 days ago

not intended for direct human consumption

Certainly. But it's still edible. Dent corn, for instance, can be and is used for cornmeal, masa, tortillas, and so on. The industrial monoculture varieties of dent corn are optimized for animal feed, ethanol, or whatever, but nothing's stopping us from eating them (except, in theory, the ridiculous amount of herbicide and pesticide that gets dumped on them).

The reason why we're growing so much corn that's not intended for direct human consumption is because of a whole shitload of broken incentives and megacorporation subsidies and America's meat addiction and the nagging worry that if we don't keep the land in use we can't justify stealing it from the natives however many generations ago.

Which is part of what the article goes into.

And it's why the idea that ethanol opposes Big Oil is so ridiculous. Ethanol and Big Oil go hand in hand. Their interests are aligned and Trump loves them both.

this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
74 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8570 readers
896 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net