1081
I think about this a lot. Even if a person "only" got 300 views, imagine those 300 people in front of you staring at you. (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) by pelespirit@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
103 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 days ago

It's a simple, I don't agree with your opinion thing. That's it.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 4 days ago

It's not supposesd to be agree/disagree, but thanks to a certain techbro who may or not be a robot, it is.

It was supposed to be "this does/not contribute something relevant to the conversation, and I may or not agree."

[-] titanicx@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago

Any tech bro had nothing to do with this. It is what the community has decided as a whole that an upvote or a down vote means in the context of a conversation on the internet.v I was on Reddit for about 17 years pretty much since the beginning. And before that I was on dig and it's always how it's been used when it comes to the context of conversations.

[-] fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk 0 points 5 days ago

I'd still upvote something if it contributed to the conversation/discussion/argument, even if i personally didn't agree with what the person is saying.

If it didn't really contribute anything, I'd leave it blank.

this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2026
1081 points (99.4% liked)

People Twitter

9880 readers
467 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works
pelespirit@sh.itjust.works