-16
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can you share an example of the lack of journalism in this piece? I agree that the media bias of this formerly-unknown-to-me source is bad, but this piece has many, many reliable sources (USA Spending website, Reuters, NYT, BBC, etc.).

And isn't it generally known that profiteering and graft occurs during armed conflict? Why not expose it?

Edit: for example, spending $US5.5M on six boats, trailers, spare parts and "training" seems high right? How much does a 38' aluminum boat usually cost? Less than $100k, right? So, was the extra $4.9M for "delivery?" why wouldn't this information be in the public interest?

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago

You are sealioning right now. Take your active measures elsewhere.

[-] s38b35M5@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Had to Google that one. Thanks, but asking why a seemingly good article from a bad source means it's a bad article isn't a waste of time. I want to know what's wrong with this article. This is a place for discussion.

[-] iridaniotter@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 1 year ago

This is not a place for discussion. This is a place to post articles about why Ukraine will win and why Xi Jinping is evil.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
-16 points (26.5% liked)

World News

32289 readers
865 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS