503
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] warm@kbin.earth 10 points 1 month ago

The majority of people don't need phones that can survive underwater. Most get exposed to a bit of rain occasionally and that's it. So even if it was impossible for both to exist (it isn't), we don't need it anyway. People are sold "IP68" or whatever because it allows manufacturers to make their phones harder to repair, that's the only reason.

[-] horse@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I actually use the waterproofing on my phone fairly regularly. I've used it to take pictures in and under water and it's handy to be able to wash it under running water. Also if I'm riding my bike in the rain I don't have to worry about my phone getting wet or sweat getting into when it's in my jersey pocket in the summer.

I think it will be pretty hard for Apple to design an iPhone with a removable battery without compromising somewhere. Making it waterproof, with a removable battery, not more bulky and with the same kind of sleek design sounds really hard. Still, it's good that the EU is forcing them to figure it out.

[-] warm@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, you have, but the majority don't, they only need basic splash protection.

Either way, there will be waterproof phones with removable batteries. They said the same thing when they removed the 3.5mm port, it's all lies.

[-] zewm@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

What about toilet drops ๐Ÿ‘€

[-] warm@kbin.earth 8 points 1 month ago

What about drops from height? We don't all use super rugged phones incase of that? Just don't hold your phone over the toilet!

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
503 points (99.2% liked)

Hacker News

4900 readers
434 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS