504
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] JakenVeina@midwest.social -1 points 4 days ago

I think it might have worked better if the requirement is for every phone to have an OPTION for a replaceable battery. I.E. manufacturers can provide a "waterproof" or "slim" or whatever version of each model, without a replaceable battery, so long as there's a version with a replaceable battery as well. With equivalent availability.

[-] tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago

I don't like the idea personally, because the replaceable battery version would be priced up, and likely not given the flagship experience. The point of this law is to prevent ewaste from 2 year old batteries performing badly, and standardising replaceable batteries is the way to stop that. OEMs would just find ways to convince users to buy the phones with no replaceable batteries because they make more money long-term that way. I don't trust corporations lol.

this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
504 points (99.4% liked)

Hacker News

4769 readers
318 users here now

Posts from the RSS Feed of HackerNews.

The feed sometimes contains ads and posts that have been removed by the mod team at HN.

Source of the RSS Bot

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS