126
Americans’ views of China more positive again in 2026
(www.pewresearch.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
126 points (100.0% liked)
World News
2047 readers
811 users here now
Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.
Other Great Communities:
Rules
Be excellent to each other
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
actually you did, where I posted a link to a wikipedia article (several actually but who's counting, this is the one you wanted to bitch about) and you responded by dismissing it altogether as "deep propaganda lore". Was all of fourteen hours ago.
Since you're clearly having trouble keeping up -- or, let's be honest, willingly choose not to -- I'm gonna stop reading right there at your "helpful explanation" about how sources work. I got better shit to do than listen to tankies trying (and failing, badly) at condescending to me; and it's been funny watching you flail, but I'm bored now. You're boring me now. Better luck next time!
I really hope you're young.
actually I just like jabbing tankies who post shitty bait with a stick and then giving them the argument equivalent of a ruined orgasm. It's nice to know they're tilted over it enough to ask you to come give moral support after getting blocked lmao
Are you here to get tilted too?
You're honestly based for this, keep it up. They get very mad and then get angrier when you call out how mad they get.
well, if you never push back on these morons, they'll just continue shitting up the place with their imperialist propaganda, and I'm about as keen to hear how great China is as I am to hear about how great the US or Israel is. Keep Lemmy a nice place by keeping blindly obedient imperialists from getting too comfortable.
Yep, I agree. They say China is a saint because of what America does, and then say if you think two things can be bad, you're brainwashed. While they say wikipedia is filled with lies and had to make their own with sources they approve of. Like Grokpedia and conservapedia.