Archived link
...
After this [Canadian] government insisted that the Indian government was cooperating with the Canadian investigation into the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar and other crimes like extortion and arson, the Indian government said there was never anything to investigate in the first place. The Carney government remained silent, directly playing into the false narrative being pushed by India.
Then, prior to leaving for an international trip that included a stop in India, a Privy Council Office (PCO) official told journalists during a technical briefing that India was no longer committing any foreign interference or transnational repression, contradicting recent statements made by CSIS. Within days, the public safety minister, the foreign affairs minister and the prime minister all came out publicly to downplay the PCO official’s comments.
True to form under this government, this past week has only added more confusion. RCMP Commissioner Mike Duheme went on CTV’s Question Period and told host Vassy Kapelos that the RCMP had no evidence of any clandestine activity related to foreign interference or transnational repression that can be linked back to a foreign country.
...
“I’m saying that based on the totality of the files that we have on foreign interference or transnational repression, what we have in our holdings is we have people that are intimidating people, harassing people — but connecting the dots to a foreign entity, regardless of the country, we don’t have that.”
So, it’s not just India that is no longer committing foreign interference or transnational repression, but all countries that have been known to conduct foreign interference or transnational repression –** India, China, Russia, Iran** – have apparently stopped their activities, according to the RCMP’s top cop.
...
Before we take the RCMP commissioner at his word and hang up a giant “mission accomplished” banner to mark the end of foreign interference and transnational repression in Canada, it’s worth noting that his words directly contradict the assessment that CSIS put out on March 1. In an emailed statement to the National Post, the spy agency confirmed that its threat assessment of the main perpetrators of “foreign interference and espionage against Canada” has not changed.
Additionally, Global News reporter Stewart Bell posted on social media on March 20 — after part of Duheme’s interview was teased out by CTV — that he had received a statement from CSIS confirming the agency’s threat assessment had not changed and that transnational repression and foreign interference remain persistent threats in Canada.
...
That the RCMP and CSIS would have different assessments is not in and of itself surprising. Trying to build a criminal case that can be prosecuted in Canada is different from collecting intelligence and there are several challenges in presenting intelligence as evidence, which was discussed at length during the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference.
...
Canadians deserve to hear directly from their government — ideally, the prime minister himself — as to what is actually happening in Canada when it comes to foreign interference and transnational repression and what the current threat posed to diaspora communities looks like. As Canadians from Iran, China, India and elsewhere face real threats of violence, extortion, intimidation and harassment from state-linked proxies, they deserve to know what the current public safety risk to their communities is.
...
Given that there was no parade of government ministers to come forward to downplay the comments made by the RCMP commissioner as they did with the PCO official’s comments, it’s likely that the government is in “wishing this story goes away on its own” mode. All while the Official Opposition chooses to stay silent on this issue for reasons that seem more curious by the day.
The result? Canadians are left in the dark as to what the actual current threat to public safety is and have increasing reason to distrust the government and the RCMP’s assessment of the threat.
It’s a recipe for success — for hostile state actors — while Canada loses.