13
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

This is admittedly about a month old, but I just ran across it. If you've got an hour to spare sometime (or just need something interesting as background noise), I'd highly recommend it.

Kurt Andersen joins Joanna Coles to trace Donald Trump’s rise from Spy magazine punchline to the ultimate show-business president, arguing that Trump didn’t invent the con so much as perfect a distinctly American tradition stretching back to P.T. Barnum’s “clever humbug,” where attention matters more than truth and audiences happily play along. Andersen dissects Trump’s maximalist language—everything the “greatest,” the “best,” the “like nobody’s ever seen”—and warns that the same improvisational instincts that fueled his celebrity now shape foreign policy, including claims of negotiations with Iran that didn’t exist and a presidency run like an endless next episode. They close on Epstein, conspiracies, and the blurry line between con and belief—asking whether Trump the salesman now believes his own pitch, and what it means when politics becomes a spectacle with global stakes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago

Prefatorily, this is entirely my personal speculation based on examining media in the US versus other countries, and my admittedly minor knowledge of history.

Anti-intellectualism did ramp up in institutionalized education in the 70s, especially with the explicit codification of jock vs nerd, but imho this really started as an unfortunate (and later exploited) knock-on effect of anti-bourgeoisie sentiment after the Great Depression and post-war era. The "All-American" working class man stereotype being contrasted against the intellectual is something that didn't happen in e.g. late 1800s France's anti-aristocratic and anti-bourgeois streak; people viewed themselves as just as capable of matching the intellect of 'elites', rather than turning intellect into a negative attribute.

When we allowed the negative depiction of intellect to permeate entertainment media (in the 50s and especially the 60s), it really set the stage for the current anti-intellectualism we're steeped in. We start teaching kids from a young age that trying to be good at anything artistic or anything knowledge-based is cringe, or nerdy, or something losers do. I've lived in other countries, and you don't see that same effect, even in 'macho'-driven cultures.

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The only two other countries I've lived in had none of our problems, but I'm getting old, so I can't speak to the current state of affairs. As an exchange student, jeans were really fucking expensive, but Birkenstocks were cheap as fuck.

In fact, anyone claiming to be proud of their country was ostracized. Guess the countries, eh?

We've brainwashed citizens into believing a nice story about how we're special and can do no wrong. I'm surprised Alex Jones didn't call the attack on a girls' school a false-flag operation.

My parents started telling me in the late '80s that I needed to stop interacting at my intellectual level, because I'd not make any friends that way. Great parenting, right there. I'm taking intermediate college algebra at ASU in third grade, and you want me to dumb it down by more years than I've been alive?

this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

11461 readers
20 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS