916
I'll just sort it myself (sh.itjust.works)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Konlanx@feddit.de 56 points 1 year ago

This is due to the default sorter in JavaScript sorting by the string value. The reason for that is that this won't create errors at runtime. Since JavaScript does not have types, this is the safest way of sorting.

This works:

const unsorted = [1, 100000, 21, 30, 4]
const sorted = unsorted.sort((a, b) => a - b) 
[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 1 year ago

Which is a fine decision if you have a programming language to do silly stuff on a personal geocities page, but a horrible one when you start using that language to handle serious data. Silently ignoring what's probably a bug is dangerous.

[-] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago

Which is a fine decision if you have a programming language to do silly stuff on a personal geocities page

And that is, of course, what it was designed for.

JS is brilliant considering that it was created by one dude in 10 days. Nobody thought it would become nearly as important as it has become.

[-] UndefinedIsNotAFunction@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Get out of here with your sensibility!

^kidding, ^js ^via ^ts ^is ^my ^life.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

ah yes, a reasonable solution to that problem that any human would think of

ah yes, a reasonable problem that any human would think of -- "what if someone tries to sort a list containing some integers and some arrays, and our interpreter needs to keep chugging instead of telling the programmer they fucked up?"

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
916 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

19503 readers
1380 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS