55
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Because a normal person knows GitHub but not Forgejo. So using the wrong thing they make an association in the person's mind.

[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 4 points 4 days ago

Huh? So we should never name things that aren't well known? What kind of logic is that? And how is saying "we're building on a forgejo instance" the same as "using the wrong thing"?

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

News headlines are usually worded in a way that's accessible to most people, and then the article can go into detail about the topic. The other commenter said nothing about how products should or shouldn't be named. By "the wrong thing", they likely meant "things that the average person can recognize, but is not the best way to introduce the topic".

People who haven't heard of Forgejo will scroll past a headline that says "The German government has started a Forgejo instance", even if they were interested in the topic. They could have also said "code repository", but it's not as eye catching as "GitHub", a name and logo that a lot of people have seen before.

Also GitHub is the incumbent that is being replaced, and is relevant to the discussion

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
55 points (96.6% liked)

Opensource

6040 readers
132 users here now

A community for discussion about open source software! Ask questions, share knowledge, share news, or post interesting stuff related to it!

CreditsIcon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS