47
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Algorithms that are specifically designed to addict you are pretty wrong technology in my eyes. Wouldn’t matter who is running it, that tech is harmful.

[-] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 1 month ago

They are deployed to addict, there is some benefit to them, Google used one back before they dropped "Don't be evil" to enhance the relevance of search results.

Now they use it to censor, and sell shit, but it was not a bad technology before it was corrupted.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Okay, but booze, nicotine, and crack were also pretty addictive.

Idk if I'd trade The Algorithm epidemic of the 2020s for wood grain alcohol from the 1920s

[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Okay, but booze, nicotine, and crack were also pretty addictive.

And heavily controlled, regulated and legislated. Algorithms aren't

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, those are also harmful technologies that harmed societies more or less depending on the historical and geopolitical context.

Right now, the algorithm is more harmful than those because everyone is addicted to them. The sheer amount of time waste and collective brainpower that is being degraded or never even being developed is staggering and will stunt our society for decades to come.

Even fentanyl, while incurring a much more dramatic and tragic cost on individuals, has a fraction of the impact on society that the algorithm will have due to the scale of our collective addiction.

It’s like how wage theft has a relatively low impact on individuals but combined represents significantly more money stolen than all other crime nationwide.

The effects are spread out over many individual people, but it has an overall dampening effect on the growth and development of communities.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Right now, the algorithm is more harmful than those because everyone is addicted to them.

Again, I don't think you're acknowledging the difference between chemical addiction and social habit.

If you spend a week without cell phone reception, you don't die from withdrawal symptoms.

[-] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 1 points 1 month ago

People have commuted suicide, though.

Just because it's not a physical addiction does not men it can't be as extreme, and generally a physical addiction will end up with nausea, exhaustion, and mood swings rather than death. It takes deep or long-term addiction to be fatal.

this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
47 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

85080 readers
1185 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS