166
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
166 points (97.7% liked)
Linux
13774 readers
799 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It is almost trivial to move git code from one hoster to another. If GitHub becomes so bad, you just move.
It's trivial if your project is trivial. Once you've got development/CI/CD workflows, releases, issue management, community interaction, maybe even project management or Github pages (may god have mercy on your soul), it gets a lot less trivial.
Git itself is a distributed version control system, moving it around is indeed trivial. It's everything else that Github provides that is far less trivial, and they've worked hard on building the vendor lock-in elements for those things lately.
True, but there are also exporter scripts for that stuff. Many projects have also mirroring already set up.
A big issue though is that you can't move other people's projects for them. If I want to contribute to Immich, I have to be on GitHub. Cloning it somewhere the maintainers aren't looking or accepting contributions does nothing.