this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
852 points (98.0% liked)
People Twitter
9988 readers
1888 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I've read about this thing a few times over the last years. It seems all research is done in Japan, there's a lot of fuss about it, but as far as I know it has never been proven to work if the tooth to be replaced is a permanent tooth. There is a lot of hype from the scientists "wo do believe it will work" kind of stuff.
See my other comment itt for the source.
Great article that source, and it seems to agree with me ( I know...)
Isn't that how most clinical trials work though? The post doesn't imply that it's solved or widely available yet
(aside from the chipped tooth photo in the thumbnail I guess)
The headlines suggest tooth regrow will be available in a few years. And it might, if you're an infant who's missing a tooth under specific circumstances. Also, in this case the scientist is hinting at more than he can deliver right now (based on the research), and he conveniently has co-founded a company to develop this drug. Let's just say I hope to be proven wrong, I could use three new teeth since I lost the previous ones 35 years ago.
Not sure why they need a phase3 at all. That's an efficacy trial, efficacy should be obvious at phase 2 and the could get approval.
They should trial through the Australian TGA, it would take years off the time.