40
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] starik@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 weeks ago

National elections are so close these days, any of these things could be the but-for difference maker in any given election. Certainly the large number of non-voters you mention (I’m note sure if any of those election fraud claims are consequential).

But, in this thread, we are responding to one particular group that consistently helps Republicans win, because they’re the ones who posted it, and they’re here in the comments to be argued with!

[-] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Except it's never been their fault. Even in the "best" years third party voters make up less than 5% of the electorate. It's a lie of statistics to not mention the non-voters. You're telling me that the third party voters are more at fault than politician whose job is to get elected being unable to steal that percentage from the non voters?

No what does happen instead? What did The Democratic Party do not long before the election? Did they appeal to the Non-Voters? Or did they appeal to "moderate" Republicans? Did they go for the larger percentage, or one that was no doubt slim and taken for?

Like doesn't it seem silly to blame 5 when 30 is such a larger number? Isn't it dumb to blame people treating democracy like democracy instead of the politicians that won't meet the electorate where it matters?

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Third party voters and non voters both get republicans elected so I don't concern myself with a distinction. They're both in the group of people that clearly don't understand how the government works, or was supposed to before they let republicans ratfuck it.

[-] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, why bother with understanding when you can just place blame. Then you'll bitch about how the Democratic Party lost again because they can't meet the electorate where they're at.

Revel in your ignorance and stupidity I guess. More worried about placing blame than fixing things like a good little blueberry.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Behold, the people that clearly don't understand how the government works.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe try understanding how voters work.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

It's every American's duty and responsibility to be civically engaged and informed. The onus is always on the voter. It mostly just speaks to how goddamn stupid and/or disengaged the average American is that they still don't understand how the system functions at a basic level. And how they can be all reliable to refusing to act in their best interests. Y'all think everything comes down to a giant douche and a turd sandwich so you take the turd sandwich because you can't tell the difference between literally eating shit and a weird shaped water tank.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

It’s every American’s duty and responsibility to be civically engaged and informed. The onus is always on the voter.

Sure, if you're in a lecturin' mood. Here in the reality where that attitude lost you two elections to donald trump, the party needs to appeal to the voters.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

This mindset is why Americans deserve what we're getting. Congratulations buddy. You're part of the problem.

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago

If you want to make voting into a health food you eat because your mommy forces you to and says it’s good for you instead of a way for people to improve their lives, don’t get mad when turnout is dogshit.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Yes you are the American that deserves what we're getting because you're apparently too fucking stupid to act in your best interests.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

This is how democrats sell genocidal candidates and then wonder why they lose.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

Hmm, active during Russian hours. Fuck off bot.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

You're really playing the centrist thought-terminating cliche greatest hits album, huh?

We would have won if we had primaries. When you remove all the candidates but one via lawfare, that's not a primary. It's a hideous mockery of democracy.

[-] edible_funk@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

We had primaries ya dumb fuckin bot.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

You had fake show primaries with only one candidate because the party's lawsuits made sure of it.

You keep shouting "russian" at me, but you're the one demanding that I accept soviet style single-candidate elections.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
40 points (83.3% liked)

Work Reform

16392 readers
3 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS