20
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
20 points (85.7% liked)
Programming
27064 readers
91 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS

In the past I've recommended onions for port forwarding. It's more simple than alternatives and using the network is free.
The authors or Tor really don't want their network used for torrenting though. They do support JS, and by extension I would argue the authors intended for their users to be able to use YouTube. In comparison to video, git traffic is insignificant. I don't see anything wrong with it, but then again, users of torrents don't usually have issues downloading without port forwarding.
That was kind of my point. Why would you bring TOR into this?
If you effectively want a DNS alternative for users, you can use GNS or Handshake or whatever.
If you need port forwarding too, or sockets or whatever, then you can use something like iroh for that.
Cloning git repos from fast hosts is slow(ish) enough already. Forcing a supposed alternative to push traffic over TOR for not even a compelling reason like anonymity is very weird.