62
submitted 1 day ago by mc900ftJesus@lemy.lol to c/world@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Kind of weird review, they didnt even try to find a GPU that it is comparable to. Looking at this table, its probably more like a 4050. The thing to note here isnt the performance right now, its the progress compared to like 2-3 years ago. If they can keep the prices at this level and keep improving performance at the same rate, then in another 2-3 years they will outperform everyone in terms of price/performance ratio. Also they have a typo here in the table they misnamed the GPU.

[-] calamityjanitor@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Even worse, the card's model is '7G106', 7G100 is the series, like saying NVIDIA RTX 5000 series of cards.

Oof yeah that makes it even worse. Cringe for how established of a site tomshardware is.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
62 points (98.4% liked)

World News

2157 readers
838 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS