Well, I can say from personal experience, devs absolutely have a say in monetization if they're not wholly owned by the publisher.

But my point is that I was speaking to the motivation businesses have to prefer one monetization scheme over another. Your comment was just "corporations evil, micro transactions bad".

If the cost of games had kept up with inflation and development costs, micro transactions wouldn't be nearly the beast it is today because there would have been a viable alternative, and customers would have more options, allowing them to "speak with their wallet" more effectively. But as it stands, it is very, very difficult for most developers to sustain themselves on single-burst, long-tail tail monetization