865
Tax Deductions (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/antiwork@lemmy.world

Source olgaf (very NSFW sex/commedy comics)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

given that one of the bulletpoints is this:

We've established that tax cuts incentivize a behavior.

you are either very bad at the thing you claim to be an expert in, or you don't fully understand the meaning of the word "disagree"

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I just don't understand what your point is besides being a contrarian asshole for its own sake. This comic has nothing to do with tax. It is mistitled. You are complaining about the wrong thing. You keep talking and say nothing. You're just pissed off at "corporations" in general. I am too. I'm sick of being squeezed for every penny I've got. But this comic isn't a problem or solution involving tax. You're just completely wrong and misguided. I really wish you could see that but you are intent on arguing for its own sake. It's so incredibly frustrating. I've offered my suggestions for starting to come up with solutions and you won't even read or respond. You're just so stubborn it's impossible to get through. I'm really trying here and you just refuse to budge. It's actually really impressive.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I just don’t understand what your point is

that propagandizing children is bad? and that "i see no issues with an incentive structure to propagandize children" is orthogonal to that

besides being a contrarian asshole for its own sake

says the person seemingly taking the position "propagandizing children is good, actually"

I’ve offered my suggestions for starting to come up with solutions

solutions to what? this entire conversation is about working out whether or not propagandizing children is a bad thing or not. if it's not a problem, which somehow seems to be your stance on this, then there's nothing to come up with a solution to

I’m really trying here

you haven't answered a single question i've asked you, nor have you disagreed with a single thing i've said, other than just now when you disagreed that tax cuts incentivize behavior

i don't think you've even stated a position other than "you're wrong" with no further elaboration

your contributions to this conversation almost entirely consist of trying to change the subject to talk about something else

i'm not sure "I'm really trying here" is a particularly apt description

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

solutions to what?

To begin: American corporate culture is toxic. That awful facade of upbeat ecstatic euphoria we have to put on to keep up the charade that everything is AWESOME is just soul crushing. We are being squeezed dry for every penny we have and we're being told it's inflation caused by demand for higher wages so people don't have to choose between rent, food, and medicine this month. Billionaires fly around on private jets and cruise super yachts while children are denied lunch in school. Half the country is fed a steady diet of disinformation telling them climate change is a lie, while they live in food deserts eating processed microwaved diabetes in a box. Economic mobility is stagnating, all the wealth is flowing uphill, our education system is out of reach for many, and overpriced anyway. Meanwhile, not a single banker, politician , or regulator has gone to jail for their part in the Great Recession which cost the taxpayers dearly, while those responsible largely walked away with millions, secure in the knowledge their banks are Too Big To Fail and will most likely be bailed out again the next time that happens. And don't even get me started about healthcare.

This comic is about these issues. Tax policy is neither the cause of nor the solution to these problems. As I've said a dozen times this comics title is misleading. I've already posted my thoughts on possible solutions to these issues twice.

Here it is yet again:

  • First I would have the FCC reign in Fox News disinformation because we’ll probably never get anywhere when 100 million Americans are being brainwashed daily

  • Campaign finance reform

  • Term limits and maybe age limits in public office

  • Ranked voting to help get rid of the two party system

  • It would be great to somehow change corporate governance to require them to prioritize all stakeholders and not just shareholders but I don’t know how to do this

  • Maybe a requirement for publicly traded companies to have one seat on the board of directors be elected by the employees to represent their interests, perhaps a requirement that maybe 10% of shares issued and outstanding be owned by said employees

But we can keep talking about charity deductions for individuals and corps if you want, even though this is the first time I'm hearing someone saying that is controversial.

PS: you want to hear something funny I just thought of? If we ban charity donation deductions for corps it would probably lead to a net DECREASE in tax revenue rather than an increase. My reasoning is that deductions are only worth 21% at the Federal corporate level but up to 37% at the individual level. So we'd probably finagle it so the donations happen anyway, just by the individuals and institutions who own the business instead, who would get a better discount on their contributions. Actions, meet unintended consequences!

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh no you went off topic again ;(

why don't we just try asking and answering questions one at a time:

  • do you agree that tax deductions for a behavior incentivize that behavior
[-] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

...I just don't get you. You're easily one of the most frustrating users I've ever encountered. I don't know how to be more clear that we got major issues but it's NOT because of tax and it's NOT solvable via tax. I REALLY truly thought my last comment would hit home but you're just impossible. Thanks for proving my initial point: "i'm sure this thread will be full of rational reasonable discussion by tax experts." Bookmark my comment and maybe read it again when you turn 20.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

that's a really weird answer to a fairly simple yes/no question

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Are you a bot? I'm really truly hoping you're an Argument Bot at this point designed to drive engagement. It's just not possible for a human to be so thick and resistant to a reasonable discussion.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

It’s just not possible for a human to be so thick and resistant to a reasonable discussion.

i know right this guy i'm talking to can't even answer a yes/no question without falling to pieces what's up with that

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's so odd how fixated you are on this one teeny tiny microcosm of a far greater issue. It's just so childishly naive and immature. I can't grasp being so narrow minded that you can't accept there's a much bigger picture you're not seeing. I hope one day you'll grow up a bit more and realize how insanely complicated our social issues are, far beyond your fixation on tax deductions for charity contributions.

[-] Primarily0617@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

i like how you interpret "stay on topic" as "this is the only topic that exists"

obviously society is more complicated than tax deductions, you absolute melt

i'm pretty sure my first reply to you was literally telling you that taxes aren't the primary issue in this comic

the point is that we were discussing tax deductions, and how "i see no issue with allowing corporations to tax deduct 'charitable' expenses that are actually just corporate propaganda" is a very silly thing to say, and an even sillier thing to say when put in the context of you having just finished announcing to the world how much smarter you are than everybody else about this issue because the word "tax" is in the title and you've seen a copy of the us tax code at least once

if you're going to die on this weird hill of insisting you're not allowed to have opinions on anything you don't literally have a masters degree in (which is weird given your recent paragraph listing off all the things wrong with society that you very obviously aren't an expert in) then you could at least do us the decency of not throwing out the smoothest of smooth-brain takes about the one topic you are supposed to know your ass from your elbow in

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for your thoughts. Goodbye.

this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
865 points (95.3% liked)

Antiwork

3568 readers
831 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

The new place for c/antiwork@lemmy.fmhy.ml

This server is no longer working, and we had to move.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.1k

Date Created: June 21, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.world/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.


Other Communities

c/workreform@lemmy.world


Server status for big servers http://lemmy-status.org/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS