818
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Saturday’s temperature had triggered an excessive heat warning across Arizona as lows were expected to range between 80F and 86F

On Saturday afternoon, the National Weather Service announced that the temperature at Phoenix Sky Harbor international airport reached 110F, making it the 54th day this year with temperatures of at least 110F.

Saturday’s temperature breaks the previous record of 53 days that was set in 2020. From 1991 to 2020, the average consecutive days of 110F or above is 21 days, the NWS said.

An excessive heat warning has been issued for south central and south-west Arizona until 8pm on Sunday as weekend highs are expected to range between 108F and 114F. Meanwhile, lows are expected to range between 80F to 86F.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

The important question is why put a city there?

[-] TheMightyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 year ago

Testament to mankind's arrogance

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

And the power of air conditioning

[-] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Follow-up question: why make that city a car-dependent hellhole of McMansion suburbs larping as a city, seemingly designed to be as energy-intensive as possible?

[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I'm not arguing for it, but as someone from Florida, I can understand why it's car-dependent. It is too hot to walk to a bus/tram stop, wait, get on a relatively freezing bus/tram with wet clothes, get off, walk in the sweltering heat, and arrive at your destination drenched in sweat to freeze in a/c again.

For mass transit to work, there would have to be lots of stops very near locations, high frequency of transport vehicles, and the culture would have to be okay with people being sweaty. Maybe people could travel with a change of clothes and a towel, but then locations would need to have changing rooms.

I think Americans are too used to the luxury of not being sweaty, so it would be hard to accept and use a mass transit system in really hot places.

[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I wonder if covering walking paths with solar panels would help?

Edit: also maybe zoning that allowed things to exist closer together instead of promoting car use

[-] Iron_Lynx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For one, the zoning should be altered to build everything close together and make walking more feasible. [(NINJA) EDIT:] Now I think about it, a number of buildings built before mechanised cooling in warmer climates were built with their ground floor entrance set back from the rest of the floors above, creating a covered, shaded walkway. Perhaps such a feature on hypothetical buildings in walkable areas in Arizona and New Mexico could work? [/edit]

For two, solar panels are but one option. Much easier would be to simply rig the place up with tarps over the streets to create shade. Hell, there's a town in Spain where those tarps are a local cultural phenomenon

[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I'm aware of the tarps, the country I live in had them and still has in some places but they have started to copy the car centric ideology (to my disdain)

I only suggested panels because they can become net negative and help offset the coal generation of electricity that's still common in a lot of places.

Also, for zoning, that's what I was thinking too, things built by as close as possible

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
818 points (97.1% liked)

News

23413 readers
1948 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS