608
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

The EU also has sanctions on Iran so a Greek company broke the sactions imposed by its country. They used the US banking system to transfer the money as well and the USA upheld the sanctions of another country.

I don't know why nobody else pointed that out.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

If Russia placed a sanction on the United States and started seizing transport ships, would that be legal?

[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

If any part from purchase to delivery touched Russia or any other country that is sanctioning the USA, yes.

It's kind of how sanctions are enforced.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay, so the Russian sanctions are hurting the American economy, causing unemployment and starvation. So, the US thinks the sanctions are illegal and decide to smuggle hamburgers to Europe for money. Russia intercepts the ships and confiscates the burgers. America objects, but is overruled by Russia and its financial institutions. Should the United States agree with the legality of the situation, even though they never agreed to the sanctions and their people are starving? Also, is it okay for Russia to do this even though it unduly hurts the people of America?

[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Well it's not smuggling if the hamburgers go to Europe and there is no sanctions. So yes that would be wrong as the trade never touched Russia. Unless the EU is also sanctioning the USA then no it would be enforcing sanctions of the EU countries.

Sanctions are enacted usually in reaction to something so as I don't know why these hypothetical sanctions are in place I can't comment on the ethicality of them.

Countries also don't agree to sanctions being imposed on them. That doesn't make sense. Thats like saying a murderer who was sent to prison should agree with the punishment or it's wrong.

Just to point out that isn't similar to the original article for the points I made in my previous comment.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Great job at avoiding the dilemma. I too can use words to avoid answering questions that place my argument in an uncomfortable position. Better to pretend to be answering the question than have to admit that I don’t have an answer. That’s why this makes perfect sense. /s

[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

...Okay ask plainly then. What is the problem you have with my answers?

Are you a free market absolutist who thinks anything that prevents people trading with whoever they like is wrong? I am going to have to disagree with you if you are.

Are you mad that it was a ship from the USA enforcing the embargo rather than a Greek one? The USA does the heavy lifting protecting all international trade routes so, in all likelihood it is the USA who is going to enforce sanctions especially when it is in there interest to do so.

Do you think a Greek company that resides in a country that is also sanctioning Iran should be allowed to facilitate a trade that breaks the law of the country it is based in? The company should be punished for breaking the law of the nation it resides in.

If this was a Chinese company and they used CNY it would have been wrong for the USA to seize the cargo and fine the company but it wasn't so that is irrelevant.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The sanctions are illegitimate.

[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

Why? You need to say why you think that. I think I have said more than enough on why I think what they did is legitimate enforcement of two countries (Greece and USA) laws.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because it condemned by the United Nations and the international community.

[-] BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Right. Okay i see what you are saying now. So. Do you want the sanctions completely repealed, or relaxed to allow better flow of medicines and food?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for asking a good question. 😉 I’m no expert with human rights and sanctions. I would like to think that they could be relaxed, but that might be difficult. Iran would find loopholes and ways to subvert the regulations. So, I think they need to be removed and let the UN 🇺🇳 take over.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
608 points (96.5% liked)

World News

38949 readers
1525 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS