1053
do as i say...
(lemmy.ca)
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Does anyone have any good advice on variable naming? Here's some of my rules I try to live by:
utils_FooBar
is
not
in bool names._
g_VARIABLENAME
calc_ImportantValueThatWillDecideTheUsersView
is better thancalc_SumYears
if the variable is more important than the others.Edit: I realize I was speaking about function-naming with the prefix stuff.
For variables, I still use prefixes, but for variable type. Even if you define the variables as types, it's still incredibly useful. For instance,
a string is
s_MyName
,enumerable is
e_MyType
,A number is int or double or whatever
i_MyAge
ord_MyWeight
This might be obvious for custom objects, but I'd still do it like this
p_Person
orper_Person
.Seriously it does make a huge difference
Not sure if you're trolling or serious.
Sorry, I'm serious. These are things I have picked up from 18 years in the industry.
Let me comment some of it then ...
Highly depends on your environment, your naming convention, etc.
In modern day programming the file names are pretty much irrelevant. All somewhat recent programming languages have modules and namespaces. I don't care in what file
fooBar
was defined. ALso: what happens if you refactor stuff and rename the file? Do you want to go through everything where the function is mentioned? (This can be automated, though, but still.)Or with whatever is the naming convention you or your team follows. I do embedded scripting and one of the projects explicitly wants
can_verb_thing
when it comes to user permissions (can_change_foobar
,can_run_baz
, etc.). It is a good advice but heavily depends on your environment.Paraphrasing the naming convention I mostly work with: Start everything with
_
that will be exported to global namespace. Also use the name of your module. Instead offoobar
use_mymodule_foobar
.Globals should be properly namespaced to global context. constants are uppercase.
And
summarizeYears
is even better. Do not use abbreviations and describe what the function does. If it summarizes the years there is no need to name it something else. Document your code (in-code documentation as well as user-facing documentation if applicable).I appreciate your emacs perspective, thanks for the input.
I get the sense that programmerhumor hates prefixes, but I'm telling you, they have changed my life. Next project-for-fun, just give it a try and see what happens. I think you'll be surprised.
To many of your points, I say I agree that a lot of naming conventions depend on context. The environment you're working in, the IDE, the team you're working on, the language you're coding in.
However, prefixes I'm firm on. I think it's unpopular because it's from a bygone era where IDEs were non-existent. And while yes, ides have replaced many of the uses, they have been the most radical change to my readability and comprehension of the code I've written.
Also, I'm mostly a js programmer, so yes, very different from emacs.
Also, for calc_SumYears, I literally meant to add the years together, hense the prefix. So, maybe the prefixes are a little more useful than you give them credit.