943
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

bike pollution is slightly more than nil just because of the CO2 we breathe out while riding

Technically, the CO2 animals exhale is carbon neutral because it's from plants you eat (or your food eats). Unless you're eating petroleum derived products of course.

I say technically because while the plants themselves are carbon neutral, modern food production and distribution, especially meat production, still has a large carbon footprint. So your breath is only truly carbon neutral if you foraged for food in the forest on foot.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

So your breath is only truly carbon neutral if you foraged for food in the forest on foot.

So once again: return to monkee

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Unless you're eating petroleum derived products of course.

I didn't come here to be judged

this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
943 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

17070 readers
21 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS