289
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Lyft is introducing a new feature that lets women and non-binary riders choose a preference to match with drivers of the same gender.

The ride-hailing company said it was a “highly requested feature” in a blog post Tuesday, saying the new feature allows women and non-binary people to “feel that much more confident” in using Lyft and also hopefully encourage more women to sign up to be drivers to access its “flexible earning opportunities.”

The service, called “Women+ Connect,” is rolling out in the coming months. Riders can turn on the option in the Lyft app, however the company warns that it’s not a guarantee that they’ll be matched with a women or non-binary person if one of those people aren’t nearby. Both the riders and drivers will need to opt-in to the feature for it work and riders must chose a gender for it to work.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zomg@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

Why not let men do the same thing?

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 years ago

It might have something to do with women being at a higher risk of being abused. But unless you've been living under a rock you already knew that. So what are you really asking?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social 24 points 2 years ago

Because women have to fear men more than men have to fear women.

[-] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 years ago

Yea but for any normal dude trying to do this as a job this means he gets less rides and less money

[-] darq@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Not proportionally though. If the service is less safe for women and non-binary people, then fewer of those people will make full use of the service. So either way, the male drivers probably aren't getting their custom. The safety features increase the size of the rider pool even as they might exclude some riders from some drivers. Women and non-binary drivers might take over the additional riders, but those drivers might have previously been driving men who are now left for male drivers to pick up. The overall impact to male drivers isn't as bad as just losing those opportunities.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a pretty good trade for human safety.

[-] JasSmith@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

Would it also be a pretty good trade for human safety if whites and Asians were allowed to choose people of the same race?

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

I don't see why white people would need to pick as I'm not seeing any articles about white people being targeted but it'd probably help with some of the violence against the AAPI community.

[-] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Oh, so just more racism, then?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

(numbers pulled out of my ass, but...)

99% of men don't need it so won't use it. 99% of the remainder will use it to find a target to harass. Whoever is left might miss out on a great feature, but they're barely a rounding error.

Personally, I'd love a feature that let me pick a driver that would just shut up.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It’s discrimination when a man does it

/s

[-] exploding_whale@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I'm a little curious how they stop it.

load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
289 points (88.7% liked)

News

35754 readers
663 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS