445
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] angelsomething@lemmy.one 77 points 1 year ago
[-] uwe@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

I'm going to be a dad in a few weeks. 🥲 (Feel free to dunk on me with the inevitable 'why?'s, and 'did you live under a rock?' I can't feel any worse anymore anyway 🤗)

[-] fred-kowalski@artemis.camp 60 points 1 year ago

I chose not to have kids. You can have my carbon offset.

Individual guilt for systemic problems plays well to the elites (ultra-wealthy). Unless you’re a billionaire. Then I want my offset back.

[-] spiderjuzce@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago

I also don't have kids so have my carbon offset as well

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

I also don't have kids but I'm keeping my carbon offset to my damn self.

[-] Azal@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago
[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

I'll take that axe if it improves my carbon offset

[-] Kill_joy@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Mine is 7 months old now. I felt the same. Just wait, you'll likely feel that it was the best thing you ever did. Your kid may be the one to drive some positive change. Just do the best you can and give yourself some grace.

[-] theonetruejason@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Yes everyone should use this logic. Your kid might be the one, have 10 to increase your odds!

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Realistically, 10 probably would spread your resources too thin, if you want each to excel enough to be part of the solution.

3-5 though, that's a good range.

[-] theonetruejason@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Your sarcasm detector needs a tune up.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

No I understood the sarcasm, and responded as the "straight foil"

It's the style of humor of Tommy Lee Jones's character in Men In Black.

[-] June@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

Good luck to you and yours. I sincerely hope we’re wrong about how bad we think it’s going to get in the next 50 years.

[-] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

You wrote hope but that message can go either way

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Human problems have human solutions.

Renewables are already cheaper than fossil fuels, it just takes time for the economics to shake out.

Plenty of jobs in a clean economy as well.

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

...it just takes time...

Yeah, that's the thing the scientists are saying we're running out of though.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Change starts slowly but the effects compound

Edit

[-] theonetruejason@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Some other effects are compounding faster…

Fossil fuel use isn't

[-] Badgernomics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"...faster than expected." I feel like we've been hearing that alot over the last few years, it's like the tagline for the climate crisis.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

The effects from about 250 years of industrialization sure did compound, huh?

So we'll compound more and be right on track in what, 300-350 years?

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Industrial revolution was not global, renewables are

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

If industrialization wasn't global surely the effects of it weren't global either 🤡

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Upgrade your reading comprehension 🤡

Where did the industrial revolution start?

It was not global from 1760 to 1820 ya jabroni

Renewables are being implemented in a far wider geographic than the Industrial Revolution was is my point

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My point is the implications of the industrial revolution don't stop at national borders.

You don't need every country to emit pollution when they all share the same atmosphere.

And it's overwhelmingly likely that the rollout of renewables and environmentally responsible infrastructure won't happen everywhere at once. It begins in the countries with the ability and materials to produce such systems.

Do you have a map of existing renewable use per capital to see if my opinion is accurate or are you just going to be a massive prick?

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's not my fault if you don't understand. Go read a book.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Great talk, you've done wonders for the community.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Great talk, you've done wonders for the community.

You called me a massive prick dude. Don't dish it out if you can't take it back.

It's not that hard a concept. I even posted a picture. Do you really think technology is not being developed and implemented faster today than the 18th century?

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I think the incentive is incredibly asymmetrical.

Everyone wants a tractor to help them plow the field, not everyone wants to do carbon capture.

I'll go read that book now lol

I thought you said you are going to be dead in a few weeks. Then I reread it, and still pretty much think the same.

[-] penguin@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Meh, humanity is getting what it deserves. We literally did this to ourselves.

[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

*Corporations and billionaires did this

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

**With a large amount of consent from the governed.

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Maybe the country with the most imprisoned people per capita should not have that claim

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Our participation rates are abysmal. We can say all we like about how voting is too hard or whatever but every thread about US politics has multiple people in it encouraging people not to bother voting.

Not voting = mostly I'm a-ok with things as is, or I don't care

That's pretty close to consent IMO, and then there's the actual voters who continually vote for rich assholes who don't give a shit about them and promise to only make it harder on poor people and easier for the rich and people vote for them in droves because of that or despite of that.

Fuck man look at the mayor of New York.

We're all about the economy in this country. Even people pretending to be environmentalists have debated with me about "well, you can't just outlaw coal" or "we can't just rush off of cars". It's all about the economy and making things easier for business people in this country to the point where the two major parties are now the business party and the business blowjobs and hookers party.

While you're mentioning incarceration, they vote for that too. We love harsh penalties for poor people and "criminals" and vote so hard for them that Democrats have to have a biannual contest with Republicans about who is most willing to fellate the police and give them more budget for urban tanks.

It all seems wrong and bizarre to me, but sit an American voter down and you'll be surprised just how many of them hold these opinions or at least some of them and continually vote for this crap.

[-] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

So people don't vote because they are convinced it doesn't have an impact, and you're saying that's consent? Nah. Us not being on the streets is more akin to consent.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think both are indicative of consent.

Gotta say even though I'm pretty cynical I love and support recent labor movement advances.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

We deserve it.

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
445 points (98.7% liked)

World News

39129 readers
798 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS