72

The All-Feed is very important to increase the content-quality of the threadiverse and therefore, ensure its existense. However, for smaller instances, there is only limited reason to put the All-Feed prominent in their UI, because their posts will never be present there. However, if they push people toward their the Local-Feed (which they currently do), people will only stay on their instance and overall discussion quality declines.

So, to truly overcome instance protectionism, we need a new feed, in which an instance can find a good balance between showing content from other instances and its own.

(Imagef by fona2, https://www.istockphoto.com/de/vektor/haus-und-baum-auf-fliegenden-felsen-wo-wohnt-gott-nach-hause-auf-den-himmeln-gm848184716-139497255?phrase=bridge+between+islands&searchscope=image%2Cfilm)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bananahammock@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

What is the incentive for instance owners to push people toward the local feed vs the all feed?

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

I'm not entirely sure what they meant. There are three settings: All, Subscribed, Local. Instance owners have to choose which is the default for their instance. Neither is "pushing" anything.

For themed instances, it makes sense to emphasize their local feed. For generic instances, not so much. Either way, users can choose another setting anytime, or even set their own default.

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm basically just suggesting a feed that takes the Local and All feed, and merges it 50/50. Meaning you have the posts in the order in which you would normally see them but in the same feed. And its not like first a Local post, then an All post, then the next Local post but a bit more shaked up: for each post in the list, a coin is thrown if the next local or all post is picked.

[-] Spzi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I see, thanks. Presented this way, I like the idea much more. I generally like the idea to customize my own feed. So I'd like to take it a step further: Let me choose the numbers. 50/50 seems like a good predefined starting point though.

Also I wouldn't stop there but include Subscribed. So while your settings might be 0/50/50 for Subscribed/Local/All, mine would be 70/20/10, and the next guy could choose something entirely different.

Similarly, I'd like to control how much weight small communities get in these feeds. And I'd like to say "whenever something is posted to this specific community, show it to me! No matter how much other interesting content there is from other communities."

[-] blue_berry@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I love that! Just made a post about it ...

[-] Willy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I think the all feed doesn't have all the subs, just the ones that have been subscribed to by anyone on the instance. local is a little more intuitive in that it's just the local hosted subs to the instance.

[-] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I just reread the post and never mind. that's not what op is talking about. still I think it's a n issue that needs addressed.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
72 points (87.5% liked)

Fediverse

28530 readers
529 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS