487

The Pennsylvania Democrat recalled his time serving as a Hillary Clinton surrogate in 2016, even after he supported Bernie Sanders in the primary.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't get it, either. Unless and until we have something like ranked choice voting, purity ponies that lodge "protest votes" only help the fascists. And these purity ponies seem to revel in creating more division within the left (and create more Republicans in the process), wanting to excommunicate each other over ivory tower orthodoxy, with the Oppression Olympics being one of the more egregious versions of that...

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Even with ranked choice voting we will not support your war monger capitalist owned dinosaurs. A 3rd party vote is not the protest vote, voting against something like Democrats voting against Republicans is the protest vote. The act of voting for something like a 3rd party candidate is how democracy is supposed to work.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

If you say so. What will result is putting more Republicans into office.

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Then Democrats need better candidates and better policy

[-] private_ruffles@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

The time for that vote is in the primaries. THAT'S when you make your stand, have your protest, and try to move the party left. Otherwise you are ignoring someone that you agree with 50% of the time and helping someone you agree with 0% of the time.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Who's our primary choice against Biden? Remember when the DnC fucked Bernie?

The choice between a soft R vs a hard R is hardly a choice.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The DNC didn't "fuck over" Bernie. He lost. I voted for him in the primary, and would have loved to see him win the nomination. But he didn't, so I voted for the next best thing (and, you know, the non-fascist).

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's some revisionist history. Some of us still remember Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

These responses were referring to the 2020 election. Wasserman Schultz hasn't been DNC chair since 2016.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Go look up why she turned in her resignation.

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Move the party left? Unless you have the ability to own our own politicians, there is no 'move the party left'

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

This is exactly what I'm talking about. Keep putting more people in power that have zero interest in democracy and possibly plan to end it, and then...what?

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

That'll teach em!

Too bad they'll never have another chance when the GOP finally seizes power as they intend and finishes off what's left of our democracy.

But at least you made your point!

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

The act of voting for something like a 3rd party candidate is how democracy is supposed to work.

Which is exactly why we need ranked choice voting because otherwise your not expressing your choices accurately. You should be allowed to vote for your candidate of choice and also pick your poison.

Don't fight against the one thing that will help third party candidates the most.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

So much this...the Democratic Party is hardly perfect, and I don't think even most Democrats would claim they are. But, again, the alternative, with the way we vote right now, is....what? Sitting this one out, hoping this time we'll really show those corporate Democrats? Voting for the Greens, which is barely even a serious party in the United States, and probably is compromised anyway?

What is the realistic option, I wonder? Sure, propose alternatives during the primary, but in the general...

[-] zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's still a bit of a Catch-22 for people who take your view. You think people should vote for the major party candidate they find least bad, while hoping for ranked choice voting so people can instead vote for the candidate they want most.

But as long as everybody votes the way you do, the parties in power have no electoral incentive at all to change the voting system. It's only when they start losing a significant portion of their voters to third parties that ranked choice starts being an appealing option to them.

I say this as someone who voted Green in 2016 (Clinton state), learned my lesson, and voted for Biden in 2020 (Trump state) and will again in 2024. I've also been much happier with Biden's presidency than I expected to be.

I am a bit encouraged that ranked choice has seen some implementation lately anyways. Hopefully it'll continue to spread. Anyone know if any new states are considering it soon?

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

voting against something like Democrats voting against Republicans is the protest vote

And most of the "vote Dem or your fascist" people think political action is about voting rather than being the bare minimum. Democrat PACs fund fascist Republican candidate's primary campaigns too so...

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yes, but those are the choices that it comes down to in the general, really. What do you propose people do?

[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well it depends on your own politics and goals so I can only speak from my own perspective. It's a bleak time to be a socialist because we don't have any political representation in NA really. The route I see is more mimicking what civil rights leaders were doing in the 50s-60s which was organizing labor unions. We don't have a big cultural moment like they did though and the labor movement isn't what it used to be, partly because of bipartisan views against it, union busting and policies watering it down, and we're fragmented, there's no class consciousness in today's political dialogue. Huge demonstrations like the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom (where the famous "I have a dream" speech was delivered), or direct actions like the freedom rides, I don't think is really possible in today's cultural setting.

I think if you're just a regular working person you can begin by organizing and trying to unionize your workplace, but even that has risks. Maybe that just means finding coworkers who share your sentiments, but ultimately it's talking to people. I'm in a unionized workplace so what do I do next, I try and get involved and do what I can. I've also joined my workplace's DEI committee to input more solidarity and political economy-aware notions of what that means opposed to the default corporate diversity industry's ideas, I saw an opportunity there and it's been very well received by some key coworkers... So assuming you're doing what you can in your job setting, the one thing that will define your "success" in life, the embodiment of your relationship to capital and the economy. Next you can get involved politically. For me that has been things like canvassing for someone who was running for office who shared my political ideology and goals, for the most left wing party in my country. At one point a close friend ran for office so I got a glimpse of that world, and we were able to increase the party's share of the popular vote in that riding, a highly contested riding between the dominant 2 parties who spend millions of dollars there, so we all considered that a success for a third party candidate there.

I think meaningful political action is really about the context of your own life and what you're able to do. No matter what it is, it really comes down to unglamorous work and talking to people. Maybe that's collecting enough signatures for a motion against a proposed bylaw to be accepted by your municipality, canvassing your own representative by organizing people, volunteering for a candidate you agree with. It could be cultural too like supporting events and causes that your politics aligns with. I have a few direct actions I do personally on the environmental front which involve restoring habitats and bit of civil disobedience (not law-breaking). It's all work though, it's not about liking some social media post or saying "agree" under a post like this, that's all meaningless distraction. Anything done online is meaningless basically.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Most people don't do the bare minimum, so that's what we're screaming about. Gotta crawl before you can walk.

[-] thoro@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The conditions that allow someone like Trump to come to power are manifested by the neoliberal policies extolled by the Democrat and Republican establishment, alike. Your party leaders are Reaganites/Thatcherites. The biggest policy win for Democrats in recent history was a Heritage Foundation plan that acts as a de facto subsidy to private health insurance.

And most people do not live in swing states so most "protest votes" do nothing to tip the scales.

creating more division within the left

Liberalism isn't the left.

create more Republicans in the process

Create more leftists, actually.

ivory tower orthodoxy

It's the Democratic establishment that abhors populism and typically walks in ivory tower circles. Liberalism and neoliberalism are the dominant ideologies in the Ivy League schools, not socialism.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] kaonashi@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

Joe Biden is still objectively awful, no lack of alternatives is going to change that.

load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
487 points (92.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2159 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS