64
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 year ago

Unless panspermia is correct, which is a super big if, why would they even have dna to test to say “this isn’t human”?

And even if panspermia is correct, what are the chances it would it be anything we even recognize as dna? It would have had so much time to diverge..

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
64 points (95.7% liked)

Strange Times

727 readers
1 users here now

News about weird nature, unusual happenings, and fringe claims. #anomalies #animals #nature #Fortean #paranormal #cryptids #weather

Run by @idoubtit@mstdn.social

RULES:

  1. Read any article linked prior to commenting.
  2. No tabloid links, junk sites, or crank content. Reference high quality news sources.
  3. No personal experience posts unless you have solid evidence in support.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS